Advocating for the only sustainable solution to Stoneham's budget crisis:
the passage of a Proposition 2½ override on Tuesday, December 9th
Proposition 2½ is a Massachusetts law passed in 1980 that limits how much a city or town can increase property taxes each year. Under this law, communities can only raise the total amount of property tax revenue by 2.5% annually, plus a small amount from new construction.
The problem is that the cost of providing services like schools, fire, police, and public works has been growing much faster than 2.5%. Over time, this creates a widening gap between what the town can legally collect and what it actually costs to run essential services.
An override is a vote by the community to increase property taxes above the 2.5% cap set by state law. Unlike temporary funding, an override becomes part of the town's base budget every year going forward. This allows Stoneham not only to balance the budget this year, but also to keep pace with rising costs.
Overrides are not unusual. Many surrounding communities have already passed them to protect schools, public safety, and town services. In fact, nearly towns across MA have passed a total of about 1,900 overrides, and 50% of those towns have passed 5 or more overrides. This includes our neighbors in Medford, Melrose, North Reading, Reading, and Wakefield.
For Stoneham, an override is the tool we need to get out of crisis mode and ensure stability.
Stoneham is facing a structural budget shortfall because expenses are rising faster than revenues:
Inflation exceeded 2.5% in 25 of the 35 years since Proposition 2 ½ was passed, averaging over 3% each year, and increasing more than 30% in greater Boston between 2015 and 2025. Even a seemingly small (<1%) difference between the 2.5% limit and inflation can mean Stoneham's costs exceed its tax revenue by hundreds of thousands of dollars in a given year. Adding this up year-over-year for the past 30+ years totals in many millions of dollar deficit.
For years, Stoneham has used reserves, one-time funds, and cost-cutting to get by, but those stopgaps are now exhausted. Without new revenue, we cannot maintain the schools, safety, and services our community depends on. Learn more about the financial challenges facing each town department here.
No override will devastate services across Stoneham.
Voting NO puts Stoneham's future and stability at serious risk. These cuts are not "extras"--they strike at the core of what makes Stoneham safe, welcoming, and family-friendly.
The override amounts represent different levels of additional funding that the town could raise through property taxes. Each amount corresponds to a specific set of services and staffing levels that would be maintained or restored in Stoneham.
Here is a table showing the impact of all three potential outcomes:
| OVERRIDE AMOUNT | $12.5M | $9.3M | $0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schools | |||
| Ensures ability to recruit and retain high-quality teachers | ✓ | ? | LAYOFFS 50-60 FTE |
| Restores curriculum, services, and other funding cuts | ✓ | ? | ✗ |
| Retain non-mandated programming (e.g., STEM, library, art, music, world languages, guidance/adjustment counselors, athletics) | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Public Works | |||
| Aligns DPW staffing with comparable neighboring communities | ✗ | ✗ | LAYOFFS |
| Restores and increases staffing | 5 | 5 | ✗ |
| Public Safety: Police and Fire | |||
| Ensures public safety staffing meets minimum safety standards[1] | ✗ | ✗ | LAYOFFS |
| Restores Police Department staff cuts[2] | 7 | 7 | ✗ |
| Increases Police Department staffing | 4 | 1 | ✗ |
| Restores Fire Department staff cuts | 1 | 1 | ✗ |
| Increases Fire Department staffing | 5 | ✗ | ✗ |
| Library, Senior Center, Recreation, and Stoneham Ice Arena | |||
| Restores Library funding cut in FY26 | ✓ | ✓ | CLOSURE LIKELY |
| Restores Recreation Department funding cut in FY26 | ✓ | ✓ | CLOSURE LIKELY |
| Restores Senior Center funding cut in FY26 | ✓ | PARTIAL | CLOSURE LIKELY |
| Maintains operations of Stoneham Ice Arena[3] | ✓ | ✓ | CLOSURE POSSIBLE |
| Town Hall | |||
| Restores Economic Dev. and addiction Prevention & Outreach cuts from FY26 | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Adds Economic Dev. Department Operations staff member | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Aligns with Override Study Committee recommendations | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Avoids "receivership" (state takeover) of Stoneham's budget and governance | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Supports level of service through at least FY29 | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
1 Stoneham Police Department needs 8 more Patrol Officers to meet standards. A $12.5M override enables hiring of 2 officers. Safety standards call for 16 Firefighters per shift. Stoneham averages 8 Firefighters per shift. A $12.5M override enables hiring of 4 Firefighters, slightly increasing per shift average.
2 Includes 3 Patrol Officers and 4 Traffic Directors.
3 Stoneham Ice Arena generates revenue to sustain its operations, but maintenance and other costs are subsidized by the Town. Without an override, the Town cannot maintain financial support for the Arena.
It is a teacher contract negotiation year for Stoneham Public Schools. Currently, Stoneham teacher pay is as much as 30% below market level.
A $12.5M override ensures Stoneham's ability to recruit and retain high-quality teachers while also restoring curriculum, programming, and service cuts from prior years.
A $9.3M override limits Stoneham's ability to both recruit and retain high-quality teachers and restore cuts from prior years.
See the Town Administrator's October 21, 2025 presentation to the Select Board for the source information for this table and additional details about what's at stake with each override amount here. Final allocation of town operating funds voted on by residents at the annual May Town Meeting.
The average annual property tax bill in Stoneham was $7,834 in 2025, which is lower than similar nearby towns. Stoneham's residential tax rate and taxes as a percentage of home value are also lower than those of many neighboring communities. See tables below. Property taxes in Stoneham will remain comparably low even if residents approve an override.
| Municipality | Tax Rate |
|---|---|
| North Reading | 13.06% |
| Wilmington | 11.45% |
| Reading | 11.39% |
| Wakefield | 11.35% |
| Malden | 11.32% |
| Winchester | 11.09% |
| Arlington | 10.77% |
| Saugus | 10.68% |
| Stoneham | 10.23% |
| Melrose | 9.90% |
| Medford | 8.80% |
| Burlington | 8.66% |
| Woburn | 8.54% |
| Municipality | Average Tax Bill |
|---|---|
| Winchester | $17,695 |
| Arlington | $11,598 |
| North Reading | $11,166 |
| Reading | $10,148 |
| Wakefield | $8,809 |
| Melrose | $8,095 |
| Wilmington | $8,048 |
| Stoneham | $7,834 |
| Medford | $7,083 |
| Saugus | $6,847 |
| Burlington | $6,773 |
| Woburn | $5,981 |
| Malden | $4,952 |
| Municipality | Taxes as % of Value |
|---|---|
| North Reading | 1.31% |
| Wilmington | 1.15% |
| Reading | 1.14% |
| Wakefield | 1.14% |
| Malden | 1.13% |
| Winchester | 1.11% |
| Arlington | 1.08% |
| Saugus | 1.07% |
| Stoneham | 1.02% |
| Melrose | 0.99% |
| Medford | 0.88% |
| Burlington | 0.87% |
| Woburn | 0.85% |
Stoneham voters will decide between two override options on Tuesday, December 9th:
You can use our Override Impact Calculator to determine the impact that each override amount will have on your tax bill.
Even with an override, it is likely that Stoneham's tax rate and spending will remain below many surrounding communities that have already passed overrides. Without action, we risk falling further behind, making it harder to attract families and businesses that keep our town vibrant.
Stoneham has been cutting for years:
Services are already stretched thin. At this point, more cuts mean fewer teachers, police officers, firefighters, and public works staff. Raising revenue is the only way to protect the services residents count on.
No, Stoneham passed a debt exclusion to build the new high school. A debt exclusion is different from a tax override. An override allows for a permanent tax increase to support a town's ongoing operational expenses, such as public safety, schools, and municipal services. A debt exclusion is a temporary tax increase to pay for a specific capital project, such as building a new school or fire station.
Debt exclusions do not impact a town's total tax levy. Once the debt is fully repaid, the tax increase ends. Stoneham's high school debt exclusion enabled the town to raise revenue needed to fund the project above and beyond the more than $50 million in grants for it provided by the Commonwealth. The debt for Stoneham's new high school will be paid off over 30 years.
No, Stoneham does not get a windfall from rising property values. By law, and setting aside new growth, each year Stoneham's total property tax levy can only increase by 2.5%.
The "total property tax levy" is the total amount the town can collect. Even if property values go up by an average of 5% in a year, the "total property tax levy" can still only go up by 2.5%.
In fact, if the total value of all property in town increases, the tax rate has to decrease so that the total amount of property tax collected increases by only 2.5%. In Stoneham, the residential property tax rate has decreased from $11.49 in 2010 to $10.23 in 2025.
Stoneham is audited each year by an independent accounting firm. In recent years, the audit has been performed by CliftonLarsonAllen LLP , which reviews and reports on the town's financial statements each year. This annual independent audit is a standard requirement for MA municipalities to ensure accountability and transparency in financial reporting. You can find Stoneham's annual audit reports dating back to 2017 here .
There are various state and local tax relief and exemption programs available to eligible residents including seniors, veterans, and blind residents. There are also relief programs for residents facing financial hardship.
You can visit the Real Estate Exemptions section of the Stoneham Town Website to learn about some of these programs.
The highest override amount that gets more YES votes than NO votes wins. Only ONE override amount can pass. Voting YES for $12.5M and YES for $9.3M gives us the best chance at saving our Stoneham! Voting NO puts Stoneham's future and stability at serious risk.
A yes vote is an investment in Stoneham's future:
The override is not about luxuries, it's about protecting the essential services that make Stoneham a strong, safe, and desirable place to live. Voting YES & YES for both $9.3M and $12.5M ensures Stoneham doesn't slip backwards, but instead stays competitive and sustainable for years to come.
The special election will be held on Tuesday, December 9th, 2025. Stoneham voters will decide between two override options: $9.3M and $12.5M.
The highest override amount that gets more YES votes than NO votes wins. Only ONE override amount can pass. Voting YES & YES for both $9.3M and $12.5M gives us the best chance to Save Our Stoneham.
Please see our Voter Information page for more details on how and where to vote.